Back to Archives
Session 1
Kei Wakabayashi
Content Director / Independent Researcher, Blkswn Publishers Inc.
Yoko Akama
Associate Professor, School of Design RMIT University / Co-lead Designing Entangled Social Innovation in Asia-Pacific (DESIAP)
Daijiro Mizuno
Professor / Deputy Director of the Center for the Possible Futures, Kyoto Institute of Technology
Hiroshi Tamura (Moderator)
Co-Founder, RE:PUBLIC Inc.
In order to generate sustainable cycles of practice, we are called to reconsider our sense of time—particularly Western, modern temporal consciousness. Critiques of linear, future-oriented, one-directional conceptions of time and of progressive, linear notions of advancement can be found in discussions such as Tim Ingold’s reflections on “generations” and Tsuneichi Miyamoto’s accounts of the practices of village communities. Drawing on such attempts to move beyond modern temporal consciousness, this session engaged in dialogue exploring the possibilities of sustainable cycles through practices of kuyō (供養, memorial rites) and the commons.
Kei Wakabayashi (Blkswn Publishers Inc.) argued that our imagination has already moved away from science-fictional futures in which society is centrally integrated by technology, shifting instead toward what has been described as a “new medieval” chaotic order. As evidenced in anime such as Demon Slayer and Jujutsu Kaisen, it is not spaceships but medieval motifs—portals, enchanted swords, and spirits—that stimulate popular imagination. Many games are set in medieval worlds, and children become familiar with sorcerous cosmologies, including dragons, through platforms such as Minecraft. Digital technologies and AI operate to reconstruct fragmented, polycentric networks; the mass media’s centralized control of information has eroded, and it has become structurally inevitable that peripheral rumors flow into the center.
This shift in imagination reveals contradictions within contemporary society. We speak of the need to depart from modernity—toward a circular economy, for example. Yet in reality, such a departure is already underway. Declining literacy rates, the migration of news media to podcasts, the proliferation of conspiracy theories, and the fandomization of politics all signal the collapse of modern order, while also indicating unavoidable structural transformations. Nevertheless, many people frame these changes as “problems to be solved,” attempting to return to modernity. Wakabayashi challenges us to confront this fundamental contradiction and to reconsider our values at a more foundational level.

Kei Wakabayashi
Wakabayashi further suggested that a sorcerous worldview is also evident in the relationship between humans and tools. Many tools were originally created as ritual or sorcerous objects before later becoming practical implements. As historian and folklorist Masao Takatori and historian Yoshihiko Amino have noted, distinctly Japanese sensibilities—such as feeling that one should not use another person’s tea bowl or chopsticks, or the custom of women hiding savings in sewing boxes—suggest that objects are imbued with individuality and inviolable domains. Tools are thus understood, in a sense, as talismanic objects.
Hiroshi Tamura (RE:PUBLIC Inc.) reflected on his fieldwork experience at CDW2025, observing that the act of sharpening a kitchen knife reconfigured the relationship between human and tool, generating new value through mindful care.
The discussion then turned to yoriai (寄合, local gathering)—traditional communal gatherings—as a mode of consensus-building grounded in a temporal consciousness distinct from modernity. As depicted by Tsuneichi Miyamoto, yoriai as practiced in village communities fundamentally differs from modern meetings. The introduction of clocks and writing through modernization institutionalized notions such as “agendas” and “problem-solving,” privileging speed and rational efficiency in reaching consensus.
By contrast, yoriai may continue for three days and nights, during which participants share experiences, wander off topic and return, and gradually arrive at a loose form of agreement. Embedded in this process are assumptions fundamentally different from modernity: attentiveness to ongoing relationships with those who will continue living side by side, and an attitude that does not seek perfect consensus.

Kei Wakabayashi
In the latter half, Daijiro Mizuno (Kyoto Institute of Technology) and Yoko Akama (RMIT University) joined the dialogue to explore forms of “practice” that move beyond modern temporal consciousness. Mizuno pointed to the limitations of SF prototyping and emphasized the importance of referencing medieval or sorcerous imaginaries as a point of departure for thinking from a position of “Not Here, Not Now.”
Akama reflected on childhood memories of Japanese folktales and the intuitive feelings of “fear” or “taboo” evoked by yōkai (妖怪, supernatural creatures), suggesting that such embodied intuitions may hold methodological significance even today.
Wakabayashi introduced the idea of visiting a library as a kind of grave visitation for knowledge, and described initiatives by florists conducting memorial rites for flowers. He emphasized the importance of preventing “zombification”—the indefinite prolongation of life through life-extending acts that deny death. To transmit knowledge and relationships across generations, the discussion suggested, we must design cycles that incorporate ritual acceptance of death alongside regeneration and circulation.
Building on this, Akama proposed that in order to transition toward “practice” beyond modern sensibilities, we may need to design and operate spaces for “practise”, that is, spaces in which such alternative modes can be rehearsed and experienced.
At the session’s conclusion, the relationship between archives and sorcery was addressed. Wakabayashi observed that in contemporary internet-based archives, the past does not remain past but lingers perpetually in the present. The session closed with the question of whether the past and imagined worlds might intrude into the present through “cursing” or “possessing (like ghosts).”

This session traversed a wide range of themes—medieval imagination, the relationship between tools and sorcery, and consensus-building in yoriai—offering insights into forms of existence that already exceed modern temporal consciousness within contemporary society. Two highlights in particular strongly engaged participants.
The first was the contrast between science-fictional imagination and medieval imagination. Methods such as SF prototyping and foresight have been widely utilized since World War II in corporate management, product development, and policymaking, and have become familiar to designers. Yet when this modern (Western) temporal consciousness—viewing the future unidirectionally from the present—is applied to Japanese sensibilities or premodern life histories, does it not produce a certain discomfort? Terms introduced by Wakabayashi—yōkai, sorcery, ghosts—offered participants insight into the source of that unease.
The second highlight was the metaphor of the archive as a “grave.” Multiple participants raised questions about this metaphor, and discussion unfolded in multiple directions. If we detach this metaphor from a modern Western worldview, perhaps a grave need not signify something dead and past, but could be understood as a living grave. Japanese practices such as Obon (お盆, festival of the dead/ ancestral) and grave visitation suggest an ongoing dialogue with ancestors—an affective dimension not yet fully articulated conceptually, and therefore rich with potential for further development.
As a practical provocation, participants asked: if visiting a library can be understood as visiting a grave, what possibilities might emerge if this metaphor were integrated into the design and operational requirements of libraries? While no definitive direction was established, the question was left open as a potential avenue for application within each participant’s field of practice.
According to Kato (2007), who analyzed Japanese perceptions of time and space, contemporary Japanese temporal consciousness comprises a hybrid mixture of linear models without beginning or end, cyclical models, and models with distinct beginnings and endings. This heterogeneous quality shapes everyday rhythms and sensibilities. Against this backdrop, it seems fitting that the CDW2025 fieldwork in Fushimi, Nagahama, and Kameoka—sites where medieval practices intersect with contemporary life—focused on forms of existence that exceed modern temporal consciousness.
The perspectives gained here are not nostalgic returns to a premodern past nor merely alternatives projected into the future. Rather, they are viewpoints that can be integrated into the “here and now,” inviting each participant to incorporate them into their own daily practices.
-
Ingold, T. (2024). The rise and fall of Generation Now. Polity Press.
-
Wakabayashi, M., & Hatanaka, A. (2023). 忘れられた日本人をひらく: 宮本常一と「世間」のデモクラシー [Reopening “The Forgotten Japanese”: Tsuneichi Miyamoto and the democracy of “seken”]. Blkswn Publishers.
-
Takatori, M. (2023). 民俗のこころ [The heart of folklore]. Chikuma Shogaku Geijutsu Bunko.
-
Kato, S. (2007). 日本文化における時間と空間 [Time and space in Japanese culture]. Iwanami Shoten.